Prospecting Tool

Prospecting Tool Issue: Inaccurate Reports for Manually Added Companies
Problem: When a company is manually added to the Prospecting Tool, the generated report can be inaccurate or misleading. This issue is especially noticeable when adding virtual companies or businesses that do not have a Google Business Profile, Google Maps listing, or public Google presence. Because these companies cannot be added through the automated prospecting flow, they must be entered manually. However, the system still attempts to generate a report as if Google data exists. Current Behavior: -The Prospecting Tool generates a report even when no valid Google data source exists -Scores, audit results, or insights appear incomplete, incorrect, or irrelevant -The tool does not clearly indicate missing data or unsupported data sources -This can lead to confusion for users and inaccurate representations when sharing reports with prospects Expected / Desired Behavior: -Detect when a manually added company does not have a Google Business Profile or Google data -Adjust the report logic to account for “non-Google” or virtual businesses Either: -Clearly flag missing or unavailable data sources in the report, or -Allow users to select the business type (e.g., virtual business, service-only, no GBP) and tailor the audit accordingly -Prevent inaccurate scoring or placeholders when required data sources do not exist Why This Matters: Many agencies work with: -Virtual businesses -Service-based companies -Startups without a Google Business Profile Accurate prospecting reports are critical for trust, sales conversations, and onboarding. Generating reports based on nonexistent data reduces confidence in the tool and creates unnecessary friction.
0
·
Bug
Load More