Ask AI

👉 OpenClaw -> Ask AI Integration 🤖🖥️📱💬
OpenClaw (previously Clawdbot/Moltbot) is an amazing personal assistant! There are a heap of benefits it offers but the most important to us agencies are that it remember convos, proactively message clients or leads, and do things on our computers (or in the cloud autonomously) - and is open source. It represents a shift from “chat-only” AI toward assistants that actually do things for us, through the messaging apps we already use (would be great if LC was in there). It acts as the orchestration layer (kind of a brain) that lets us combine models, tools, and scripts into a fully automated pipeline. It can definitely improve the quality of service we offer clients, allows us to sell “AI‑powered operations” as a premium layer on top of GHL, and offer deeper engagement with their business beyond a sales and marketing partnership. We should bring it into the HL/Ask AI ecosystem since productivity is something we promote. https://openclaw.ai/ It: Operates autonomously Runs locally or in the cloud Works 24/7 Is LLM-agnostic Interfaces with messaging apps Perform actions (browse, email, work in the terminal, control devices, manage files etc.) Maintains memory persistence across sessions A lot of problems can be solved using it as a productivity assistant, and new ways of doing things can be invented if we can integrate it. Some of the things mentioned in these posts overlap with what it can do. https://ideas.gohighlevel.com/conversation-ai/p/ghl-ai-assistants-system-wide-and-next-level-use-cases https://ideas.gohighlevel.com/ask-ai/p/ask-ai-use-cases Example Use Cases: Automate email responses Advanced lead scoring Fetch call transcript, summarise or even take actions from the call like sending price estimates, or quotes via text or email, and then follow up Generate content and write marketing copy Understand intent, and build context-aware scripts for follow ups and nurture Feed data into Claude and generate custom offers, marketing strategies or business insights Write personalised review responses Brief generation for sub-account and/or staff members every morning Provide actionable recommendations by analysing pipeline performance, lead quality, sales rep activity, and missed opportunities etc. Ideal for remembering conversation history and bringing it all into context - like references to a specific quote a contact got last time, or the guarantee conditions they got on a product or service, etc. Generative AI platforms wait for you to open them. OpenClaw can reach out proactively: "Hey, you have 3 urgent emails and a meeting in 20 minutes" "That product you're selling is almost out of stock." "Weather's bad tomorrow - might want to reschedule" It's like having a personal assistant who actually pays attention and does things on our computers. Not just answer questions. Actually do stuff. Ideal upgrade for Ask AI. Fill out forms Respond to messages Send emails Work with files Run apps Control the browser Maybe even get it to work with GHL using the browser or desktop app. Why not?! Apparently, someone rebuilt their entire website while watching Netflix without opening their laptop just by texting instructions. It'd be great to draw some inspiration, move fast and power the HL ecosystem using OpenClaw. Needs a Claude subscription but please let us create, import and share skills.
4
Allow Agency-Level Agents to Run in Student Sub-Accounts Using That Sub-Account’s Data
I run a coaching SaaS on HighLevel where each student has their own sub-account. Inside their sub-account, they create structured “digital assets” — their USP, avatar, brand promise, offers, etc. These assets are unique per student and must stay isolated within their sub-account. I want the ability to build custom agents using Agent Studio inside my own agency sub-account (e.g., a test/ops sub-account) and then make those agents available to my students through Ask AI across all their sub-accounts. The workflow I’m trying to enable: Setup I create an agent (e.g., a “Blog Creator Agent”) in my main agency sub-account. I expose this agent inside Ask AI so students in other sub-accounts can use it. Each student’s sub-account contains their own digital assets and contextual data. Runtime When a student in Subaccount B asks Ask AI: “Create a blog post for my offer,” the system should: Route the query to my agent stored in Subaccount A. Allow the agent to securely access the student's data in Subaccount B (USP, avatar, offer, brand voice, etc.). Generate a personalized output using that sub-account's data. Return the result to Ask AI inside the student’s sub-account — without exposing my agent’s internal logic or prompts. In short: Agent logic lives in the agency's sub-account (A). Agents should be able to securely read student data from student sub-accounts (B). Students only see the final result, not the agent’s backend logic. This would enable agencies like mine to create reusable, proprietary AI agents that provide personalized outputs for each student—powered by the student’s own data but centrally maintained by the agency." An extra feature to this would be that we can add custom fields to the brand voice "form". That way we can "inject" our methodology framework calling on those fields contents through the agents.
0
Ask AI as an executive assistant or management consultant
Ask AI as an executive VP rather than as an entry-level receptionist. Right now, many of the proposed agents feel like entry-level roles (receptionist, junior marketer, task executor). That’s useful; but I’m more interested in Ask AI eventually functioning like a chief of staff / executive VP rather than a frontline assistant. The mental model I’m using is the solo or very small business owner, the person who is simultaneously the owner, operator, foreman, and salesperson. They are so busy serving customers that they rarely have time to step back and think about the business itself, let alone analyze data. We often tell business owners to “know your numbers,” but that advice assumes they: > Know which numbers matter > Have time to analyze them > Know what “good” looks like Many don’t; not because they’re incapable, but because they’re overloaded. Thoughts on the poll options: CRM Agent: I hear “CRM Agent,” I imagine a receptionist. That may be valuable - but only if the objectives, authority, and guardrails are clearly defined. What guidance is the agent operating under? What does “success” look like? Is it doing something new, or just executing workflows differently? Users who vote for this signals pain points I don’t personally experience - not that the idea is wrong. Email Agent (outbound): I had a chance to look at the Email AI beta. I’m only marginally interested in generating “beautiful” marketing emails; as a recipient, I usually ignore them because they’re obviously not personal. However, if “running campaigns” means: > Monitoring engagement > Adjusting strategy mid-stream > Knowing when to stop sending …then that becomes more interesting. An Email Agent as a content strategy implementation specialist, not just a writer, is compelling. Content Agent: Adding blogs to the current Content AI makes sense. But the real opportunity, in my view, is a master content strategist that plans a quarterly narrative and then uses sub-agents (social, email, blog) to execute a cohesive, audience-aware, cross-platform message. If it’s just writing content, that’s mildly interesting. If it’s orchestrating an on-brand, culturally relevant, omni-channel strategy — that’s very interesting. Support Agent: This is the biggest immediate gap from what I’ve seen so far. A support agent needs to: > Understand HighLevel’s limitations > Know when to say “I need to hand this to human support” > Assume users have low technical literacy If this is ever rolled out to client accounts (not just agencies), those constraints matter. A support agent that can check inventory, shipping schedules, or account state would be valuable. A support agent that confidently gives wrong answers is worse than no agent. Additional use cases: Inbound Email / Mailroom Agent: Most AI discussions focus on outbound. Historically, businesses also had mailrooms and executive assistants who triaged inbound communication. HighLevel still struggles here. For example, the “Customer Replied” trigger doesn’t actually detect new inbound emails properly and can’t evaluate headers (sender, recipient, or subject). ( https://ideas.gohighlevel.com/automations/p/customer-replied-trigger-add-a-separate-trigger-for-new-messages ) An inbound triage agent would solve a longstanding platform pain point. Account Analyst Agent: For agencies, this would function like a junior account strategist: > Evaluating KPIs across campaigns and channels > Spotting underperformance or drop-offs early > Highlighting opportunities the client may not see > Prompting proactive, data-backed conversations with clients For Service businesses: Imagine a small home services company (plumber, roofer, HVAC) running ads, answering calls, and sending follow-ups through HighLevel. But then acting as a customer service representative responding to queries and evaluating sentiment, shifting priorities, and advising the owner if special care or attention is needed. An experienced sales rep, not just an order taker. Instead of the agency reacting when the client complains, the agent flags issues early and frames the conversation: “Here’s what’s changing, here’s why it matters, and here are two options to correct course.” This turns account management from reactive support into decision support, which is where agencies deliver value. Decision Support Agent More broadly, this is about helping business owners see the forest instead of getting buried in the weeds. An agent that evaluates trends: > Sales > Calls > Content > Inventory …and then interprets what that means would be enormously valuable for busy operators. The core idea At a higher level, I’m less interested in Ask AI as a task doer (though those sub-agents are necessary) and more interested in Ask AI as a business analyst, consultant, and auditor.
5
Load More