LC Phone Spam Protection, Number Reputation Checks, and Spam Caller Quarantine
under review
M
Marc-Andre Chappuis
LC Phone needs stronger spam protection before spam calls pollute Conversations, create fake contacts, or reach Voice AI and other paid features.
I am a new GHL user and started receiving more than 40 spam calls per day on an LC Phone number. These calls are creating noise in Conversations, adding fake contacts, and making it harder to see real prospects and customers.
After reviewing the Ideas Board, it looks like many users have reported similar spam problems for years. This does not seem isolated to one account or one number.
The current workarounds are not enough. IVR quarantine adds friction for real callers. Buying a new number adds cost and does not guarantee a clean number. Manual blocking and DND are after-the-fact cleanup.
The possible protections that could help users include:
- Phone number reputation checks before LC Phone numbers are assigned.
- A visible phone health score inside GHL.
- A clear SLA or fast replacement process for polluted numbers.
- Carrier-side escalation when a number is already spam-polluted.
- Caller spam blocking and quarantine.
- A “mark as spam” option for callers and contacts.
- Future calls from marked spam numbers dropped or hidden.
- Spam contacts archived or moved to a separate blacklist area.
- Automatic removal of spam contacts from funnels, pipelines, workflows, opportunities, and automations.
- Better filtering in Conversations, including filtering by inbound phone number.
- Voice AI spam detection and quick hang-up.
- Billing protection for spam-related Voice AI usage, transcription, summaries, recordings, and Voice Intelligence when spam is identified.
From an agency perspective, this is also a serious concern. I would be hesitant to port a client’s main business number to LC Phone if GHL cannot confirm number reputation or provide stronger spam controls. A safer approach may be to keep the client’s main number with their current carrier and forward calls to LC Phone instead.
The main concern is that spam should not be allowed to reach Conversations, workflows, Voice AI, or paid features without better controls.
Log In
T
Tony Aponte
I agree 100%. I have had to create a spam call workflow to help minimize spam calls but I constantly get calls from my clients about the amount of spam calls. This would be extremely helpful.
M
Marc-Andre Chappuis
Tony Aponte thanks for backing this up.
What workflow have you put in place so far? I am trying to understand what others are doing as a temporary workaround while we wait for better spam protection at the LC Phone level.
T
Tony Aponte
Marc-Andre Chappuis to be quite honest with you...it is very tedious and it doesn't fully block spam...the issue is that in order for the workflows to work it has to catch it BEFORE the call goes through so really all it does is once a call gets through is when it gets spam likely and then blocks it but thats about as far as it goes. The spam calls have actually gotten worse so the workflow isn't really doing much anymore. Thats why this needs to be addressed. I just had a conversation yesterday with one of my clients a bit frustrated with all the spam calls. So this is highly needed.
M
Marc-Andre Chappuis
Tony Aponte thanks for explaining that. That is exactly the issue I am seeing too. Workflows may help with cleanup after the fact, but they do not solve the real problem if the spam call has already reached Conversations, contacts, workflows, or paid features.
Your client example is important because this is not just an inconvenience inside one account. It creates support issues for agencies and frustration for clients.
This really needs to be handled at the LC Phone level with stronger spam detection, caller quarantine, number reputation checks, and billing protection before it reaches Voice AI or other paid tools.
S
Shreyas Gupta
updated the status to
under review
Sahib Kapoor : Let's review these. Valid asks
M
Marc-Andre Chappuis
Shreyas Gupta I appreciate it. Thanks
T
Tony Aponte
Shreyas Gupta Please do so.
D
Davinder Singh AO
Agreed