Hey team šŸ‘‹
First of all — Custom Objects + Associations are a game-changer.
They unlock a deeper CRM that goes beyond ā€œsingle contact per record.ā€ I love using associations to support real-world relationships like:
Husband ↔ Wife
Parent ↔ Child
Member ↔ Coach
Resident ↔ Carer
Student ↔ Teacher
This gives huge value to verticals like dance studios, gyms, schools, childcare, aged care, and medical practices where contacts naturally exist in relationship groups.
🚨 But the 1,000 association limit is a major blocker
In the current setup, a standard family structure quickly consumes these associations:
Example: Parent ↔ Child
2 parents + 1 child = 2 associations
2 parents + 2 kids = 4 associations
2 parents + 3 kids = 6 associations
That means:
Family size Associations used Business hits limit at…
1 child 2 500 families
2 children 4 250 families
3 children 6 166 families
For many of my clients, 250–600 family relationships is TINY. A busy dance school or gym easily handles 1,500–4,000 family/member relationships.
šŸ Result: We can’t confidently sell this feature
Ethically, I must tell customers upfront about the cap. But doing so kills confidence and potentially drives them to other CRMs that support scalable relationship mapping.
GHL’s own documentation states:
ā€œThe association limit is set to prevent performance issues and can’t be changed.ā€
I totally understand the intent — performance matters.
But as it stands, the limit forces us to cap who we can sell GHL to.
This is business-limiting for us and for you.
āœ… Proposal
Please raise the association limit to something practical:
āž”ļø Minimum viable expansion: 20,000 associations per sub-account
This would allow:
Larger revenue-generating studios and gyms
Multi-branch operators
Verticals with natural multi-contact households
More impactful automation and personalization
Even better:
āœ” Tiered limits based on plan level
āœ” Ability to request increase via support
āœ” Optimizations that allow scaling without performance issues
šŸ’” Why this matters for GHL long-term
Drives more mid-market adoption
Makes GHL truly competitive with vertical CRMs
Unlocks more automation and AI use cases
Prevents need for external databases/workarounds
Increases customer retention (ours & yours)
ā¤ļø In short
You built an AMAZING feature — but the current limit makes it impossible to deploy at scale in the industries that need it most.
Please consider raising (or allowing paid expansion of) association limits so GHL can continue to scale with real-world business needs.
Thanks for considering this — happy to provide further examples or testing support. šŸ™

Photo Viewer

View photos in a modal